Supreme Court nominee John Roberts Jr. might be admirable in many respects, but as a private attorney he committed an act of intellectual dishonesty that is drawing attention from one group - the American Indian - that already fears the worst from the current court. In a brief submitted to the Supreme Court in 1997, Roberts distorted the language of a well-known precedent in a way that can only be called a blatant misrepresentation. more >>
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest
in receiving the included information for research and
educational
purposes. We/I/Whomever have no affiliation whatsoever with
the
originator of this article nor are I/We/Whomever endorsed or
sponsored
by the originator.)
No comments:
Post a Comment